Need help on your Contracts final. Just call Wesley Snipes, "the contractor".
*Disclaimer
This will (probably) only be funny to those who are in or have attended law school.
Jokes are not guaranteed to be funny and by reading them you have agreed to an arbitration clause.
Jokes are not guaranteed to be funny and by reading them you have agreed to an arbitration clause.
Showing posts with label Contracts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Contracts. Show all posts
Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Tuesday, November 23, 2010
A case of fowl play
In honor of Thanksgiving, let us know forget the infamous case Frigaliment Importing Co. v. B.N.S. International Sales Corp which faced the ever important question - What is chicken? What I do know, the Bluth family wouldn't be able to tell you.
Wednesday, November 17, 2010
When a tomato has been splashed
"The first payment was also the last. Shortly after the sign was installed someone hit it with a tomato ... rust, also was visibile ... in its corners were 'little spider cobwebs'... 'some children's saying written down in here.'"
" And that really brings it down to the tomato. And of course, when a tomato has been splashed all over your clock, you don't like it." - Walter & Co. v. Harrison
" And that really brings it down to the tomato. And of course, when a tomato has been splashed all over your clock, you don't like it." - Walter & Co. v. Harrison
Monday, November 15, 2010
"A delightful read"
Vokes v. Arthur Murray, Inc was presented to our class by a student as a "delightful read". It was indeed.
Worry not, the court found for the widow. So sit back and enjoy the language brought to you by Judge Pierce.
"Plaintiff Mrs. Audrey E. Vokes, a widow of 51 years and without family, had a yen to be "an accomplished dancer" with the hopes of finding "new interest in life". So, on February 10, 1961, a dubious fate, with the assist of a motivated acquaintance, procured her to attend a "dance party" at Davenport's "School of Dancing" where she whiled away the pleasant hours, sometimes in a private room, absorbing his accomplished sales technique, during which her grace and poise were elaborated upon and her rosy future as "an excellent dancer" was painted for her in vivid and glowing colors."
Some more colorful language:
"Thus she embarked upon an almost endless pursuit of the terpsichorean art"
"she was influenced unwittingly by a constant and continuous barrage of flattery, false praise, excessive compliments, and panegyric encomiums"
"She was incessantly subjected to over-reaching blandishment and cajolery. She was assured she had "grace and poise""
Worry not, the court found for the widow. So sit back and enjoy the language brought to you by Judge Pierce.
"Plaintiff Mrs. Audrey E. Vokes, a widow of 51 years and without family, had a yen to be "an accomplished dancer" with the hopes of finding "new interest in life". So, on February 10, 1961, a dubious fate, with the assist of a motivated acquaintance, procured her to attend a "dance party" at Davenport's "School of Dancing" where she whiled away the pleasant hours, sometimes in a private room, absorbing his accomplished sales technique, during which her grace and poise were elaborated upon and her rosy future as "an excellent dancer" was painted for her in vivid and glowing colors."
Some more colorful language:
"Thus she embarked upon an almost endless pursuit of the terpsichorean art"
"she was influenced unwittingly by a constant and continuous barrage of flattery, false praise, excessive compliments, and panegyric encomiums"
"She was incessantly subjected to over-reaching blandishment and cajolery. She was assured she had "grace and poise""
Sunday, November 14, 2010
Letter of the Law
Even your clothes want to tell lame law jokes. Thanks to Laurie Sellick and Cambell v. Wentz.
![]() |
| You can actually buy this at Zazzle! |
Wednesday, November 10, 2010
Bam!
The Essence of Emeril the contract.
- inspired by the court finding that delivery in December was in essence in Internatio-Rotterdam, Inc. v. River Brand Rice Mills, Inc.
- inspired by the court finding that delivery in December was in essence in Internatio-Rotterdam, Inc. v. River Brand Rice Mills, Inc.
Tuesday, November 9, 2010
Can't Always Get What You Want
"When I said READING pipes ... I meant READING pipes biaatch!" -inspired by Jacob & Youngs v. Kent
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



